Scientology online dating dating sites mumbai

Scientology is publicly, and often vehemently, opposed to both psychiatry and psychology.Scientologists view psychiatry as a barbaric and corrupt profession and encourage alternative care based on spiritual healing.The Church of Scientology’s objection to secular ideas about mental health are religious in nature, based on the conviction that humans are essentially divine beings who have been marred by negative experiences acquired over several lifetimes.Scientology also purports that the secular perception of what is mentally normal are not based on science, a contradiction to the claims of psychiatry and psychology.Garrison then states, "It was partly on the basis of these policy reforms that the New Zealand Commission of Inquiry recommended that no legislative action be taken against Scientology". In separate cases in 19, attorneys for Scientology argued that the Fair Game policy was in fact a core belief of Scientology and as such deserved protection as religious expression.

Some major sources of controversy are the Church's aggressive attitude in dealing with its perceived enemies and critics, Although U. intellectual property law allows for "fair use" of material for commentary, parody, educational purposes, etc., critics of the church such as Gerry Armstrong have argued that the church unfairly and illegally uses the legal system to suppress "fair" uses, One example cited by critics is a 1995 lawsuit against the Washington Post newspaper et al.When the RTC first approached the Court with its ex parte request for the seizure warrant and Temporary Restraining Order, the dispute was presented as a straight-forward one under copyright and trade secret law.However, the Court is now convinced that the primary motivation of RTC in suing Lerma, DGS and the Post is to stifle criticism of Scientology in general and to harass its critics.The organization's actions reflect a formal policy for dealing with criticism instituted by L. Hubbard codified this policy in the latter half of the 1960s in response to government investigations into the organization. So BANISH all ideas that any fair hearing is intended and start our attack with their first breath. This resulted in a video being distributed by Scientologists of a shouting match between Sweeney and Scientology spokesman Tommy Davis.In 1966, Hubbard wrote a criticism of the organization's behavior and noted the "correct procedure" for attacking enemies of Scientology: Don't ever tamely submit to an investigation of us. The church has reportedly released a DVD that accuses the BBC of organising a demonstration outside a Scientology office in London, during which "terrorist death threats" were made against Scientologists.

Leave a Reply