Radiocarbon dating marine sediments
Even with such manipulation, the scientists still can't remove all the discrepancies. It is under this pretense that scientists take up the false hypothesis of evolution as their religion, the foundation of their knowledge.That is what the Bible terms "the oppositions of science falsely so called" (1 Timothy ). Doesn't that give accurate dates of "prehistoric" civilizations?Carbon dating is the ultimate benchmark of the evolutionary dating world.Everyone assumes that dates that follow the word "radiocarbon" are accurate, precise and sure. The basic principle of radiocarbon dating is that plants and animals absorb trace amounts of radioactive carbon-14 from carbon dioxide (CO2) in the atmosphere while they are alive but stop doing so when they die.The carbon-14 in a sample decays at a steady rate after it dies, and thus works like a clock.
"Fancy statistical treatments" that didn't even resolve all of the discrepancies?There is no other way to verify the calibration charts accurately! In 2004, the claimed reliability of radiocarbon dating supposedly got a boost to 26,000 years, and then again in 2010 back to 50,000 years ago - the point at which there is too little carbon-14 to measure accurately.Scientists, however, will push the envelope to 10,000 B. Scientists now claim 50,000 years is as far back as this method can go."Despite the uncertainties associated with the older part of the age range, the international radiocarbon community has recommended that intcal 98 be used as the basis for calibration for the time being" (emphasis mine throughout).So even though it is less reliable and has some serious problems, scientists ignore that and still use it.